<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Long vs. Short Website Copy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://writing-etc.com/blog/writing/long-vs-short-website-copy.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://writing-etc.com/blog/writing/long-vs-short-website-copy.htm</link>
	<description>Helping You Achieve Online Business Success</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2010 06:06:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oscar, "The PLuRalizer"</title>
		<link>http://writing-etc.com/blog/writing/long-vs-short-website-copy.htm/comment-page-1#comment-142</link>
		<dc:creator>Oscar, "The PLuRalizer"</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 07:12:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://writing-etc.com/blog/http:/www.writing-etc.com/blog/copywriting/how-to-make-sure-your-website-copy-gets-read#comment-142</guid>
		<description>&quot;I tend to agree with the woman’s skirt principle: copy needs to be long enough to cover the essentials, but short enough to be interesting.&quot;

Funny it is, but very true!

I read MarketingSherpa&#039;s article on this, and what you said jibes perfectly with what was said in that.

An even shorter, crisper one would be: &quot;It depends&quot;... on the product, the audience, etc... MarketingSherpa&#039;s case study on long vs. short copy suggests that these 2 words do tell the truth.

On another topic, what about monetizing content-rich websites and blogs, whether or not they are well-written?

Here&#039;s what looks like a good monetization option:

http://etopicana.com/default.html

It&#039;s about getting paid from ALL (that&#039;s 100%) of your website visitors, NO AD CLICKS REQUIRED!

Check it out. It may help you generate more revenue from your blogs and websites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I tend to agree with the woman’s skirt principle: copy needs to be long enough to cover the essentials, but short enough to be interesting.&#8221;</p>
<p>Funny it is, but very true!</p>
<p>I read MarketingSherpa&#8217;s article on this, and what you said jibes perfectly with what was said in that.</p>
<p>An even shorter, crisper one would be: &#8220;It depends&#8221;&#8230; on the product, the audience, etc&#8230; MarketingSherpa&#8217;s case study on long vs. short copy suggests that these 2 words do tell the truth.</p>
<p>On another topic, what about monetizing content-rich websites and blogs, whether or not they are well-written?</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s what looks like a good monetization option:</p>
<p><a href="http://etopicana.com/default.html" rel="nofollow">http://etopicana.com/default.html</a></p>
<p>It&#8217;s about getting paid from ALL (that&#8217;s 100%) of your website visitors, NO AD CLICKS REQUIRED!</p>
<p>Check it out. It may help you generate more revenue from your blogs and websites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
